by Janet on November 2, 2009
Simplicity sells.
In fact, simple may be the most powerful marketing claim in 2010, according to an article last week (Oct. 27) by Bruce Horovitz in USA Today.
“If 2009’s hottest sales pitch was all about buying stuff on the cheap, 2010 marketing will increasingly stress less as more, as in fewer parts, additives or ingredients. While the trend is taking hold in many product categories, including health and beauty items, nowhere is it more apparent than with things we eat and drink.”
Glad to see that I was a jump ahead of USA Today. I’ve been writing about the simplicity trend for months, and was even interviewed by ABC News on the topic in June.
Here’s a look back:
Simplicity is the New Sophistication, April 23
Putting the “No” in Innovation, May 11
Update on Global Consumer Trends in 2009, Sept. 2
Short Ingredient List Has Become Something to Brag About, Oct. 25
As Bruce writes in USA Today:
“Consumers these days not only want to know what’s in the stuff they eat and drink — they want to know what’s not….Folks are increasingly demanding cleaner food labels: no artificial food colorings (some of which have been linked to hyperactivity in children), no chemical additives (such as MSG) and no chemical preservatives (such as BHA). If they can’t pronounce it, consumers don’t want it.”
Perhaps it was Michael Pollan who popularized the concept of few ingredients. In his best-selling book In Defense of Food, he recommends buying only foods with five or fewer ingredients.
In last week’s USA Today:
Few are talking louder about simplifying ingredients than Haagen-Dazs. But its red-hot Five ice cream line did not come from a breakthrough in its new product lab. Five was born in the marketing department of parent company Dreyer’s Grand Ice Cream.
Early in 2008, Ching-Yee Hu, a self-proclaimed foodie and brand manager at the company, observed a consumer focus group meeting that convinced her it was time for Haagen-Dazs to create a line with an absolute minimum of ingredients.
At the gathering in San Francisco, a panelist mentioned that when he shopped recently, he found himself comparing a bag of potato chips that had 20 ingredients with a bag that had three. He said the bag with the short list was the obvious choice.
“As he told this story, I could see all the other consumers in the room nodding their heads in agreement. And I wondered: Why can’t we bring ice cream down to the bare minimum,” Hu recalls.
Now a lot of other companies are jumping on the simple bandwagon, including Pillsbury, Starbucks and even pet food manufacturers. Natura Pet Products makes California Natural dog and cat foods with a tagline of “pure and simple.” The company said since simplifying the packaging last year — and stressing the short ingredient list — Calornia Natural has become its fastest-growing line.
So what’s the bottom line? It’s great that companies are taking a harder look at their ingredients — and getting out what they don’t absolutely need. Shoppers are scrutinizing ingredients today like never before. It’s the fresh, real and less processed trifecta, which has become the new definition of quality.
Increasingly a short ingredient list is becoming a less processed cue (at a time when “minimally processed” and “closer to nature” have become major rallying cries). A trend toward less processing is good. But remember, fewer ingredients doesn’t necessarily mean healthier. A five-ingredient ice cream or cookie is still ice cream and cookies. Potato chips with a short ingredient list are still potato chips.
Be sure you’re spending as much time filling your cart with foods that don’t have an ingredient list.
Tagged as:
Haagen Dazs Five,
ingredient lists,
natural,
simple as marketing claim,
simplicity sells,
Simply cookies
“Natural” keeps gaining steam, even if people aren’t quite sure what it means.
A new survey found Amercian shoppers believe a “natural” label claim is a better indicator of an eco-friendly product than “organic.” The Shelton Group conducted a survey of 1,006 U.S. consumers and found that nearly two-thirds were looking for greener products. Yet many consumers have become more skeptical of companies’ green credentials, accusing them of “greenwashing.” They also don’t seem to understand green terminology.
When asked “How do you know a product is green?” the top response was “don’t know/not sure,” at 22%. The second most popular response, at 20%, was “says so on the package/label.” And what influenced them the most on the label? The most persuasive was ”100% natural,” at 31%. The term “organic” was less trusted, at 14%.
Despite federal certification standards, consumers thought ”organic” was an unregulated marketing buzzword that means the product is more expensive. “Natural” carried more weight.
This comes at time when the purity of the “organic” label is being questioned. This Washington Post article reviews the issue and the growing concern that trust in the USDA Organic label is eroding.
“Relaxation of the federal standards, and an explosion of consumer demand, have helped push the organics market into a $23 billion-a-year business, the fastest growing segment of the food industry….But the USDA program’s shortcomings mean that consumers, who at times must pay twice as much for organic products, are not always getting what they expect: foods without pesticides and other chemicals, produced in a way that is gentle to the environment.
The market’s expansion is fueling tension over whether the federal program should be governed by a strict interpretation of “organic” or broadened to include more products by allowing trace elements of non-organic substances. The argument is not over whether the non-organics pose a health threat, but whether they weaken the integrity of the federal organic label. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has pledged to protect the label, even as he acknowledged the pressure to lower standards to let more products in.”
Is organic food worth the extra cost? That’s the question recently posed by WebMD is this slide show.
Update: Since my original post on the subject of “natural” vs. “organic,” the topic was featured in a front-page article in the Chicago Tribune by Monica Eng. It really hits home the current state of consumer confusion and how the lines between natural and organic are being blurred.
Tagged as:
green eating,
natural,
organic,
USDA Organic label
by Janet on June 22, 2009
“Naturally sourced” is a hot trend and companies are quick to tout this attribute on product labels. “Natural” is now the leading claim on new products, according to the Mintel Global New Products Database, which indicates that the claim was included on 23 percent of foods and beverages launched last year.
The recent Institute of Food Technologists meeting in Anaheim, California, featured a ton of examples. Take a look at this IFT trend tour that showcases the array of naturally sourced products on display.
Included in this video is black garlic, which is one of the emerging flavors and foods that Dana McCauley writes about in the Topline Trends section of her food blog. Dana is a wonderful food trend tracker and I encourage you to check out her site (”a recipe writer’s diary”). Black garlic was also hailed as an “it” ingredient by The Washington Post: “In relatively short order, black garlic has morphed from obscure dietary supplement to trendy top-chef ingredient.”

Black garlic even has its own web site Black garlic, where you can learn more about this product, find recipes and order it online.
It does appear that black garlic is poised to be the next naturally sourced super food. So what is it? Black garlic is made by using a patented, month-long heat-curing process that boosts the antioxidants and natural compounds in raw garlic that have been linked to a reduced risk of cancer. The fermentation also creates a softer, chewy texture and a slightly sweet, licorice taste. Forms of fermented garlic have long been eaten for health reasons in Korea and Japan. In fact, black foods overall are a hot trend in Asia – a topic I wrote about previously for the Chicago Tribune.
So it seems…natural is the big buzzword and black is the new black.
Tagged as:
black garlic,
food trends,
IFT,
Mintel,
natural,
naturally sourced ingredients,
new food products,
nutrition trends

I wrote earlier about the trend of simplicity and the campaign that Shredded Wheat had in the works. Now the new anti-innovation ads have been launched, which play into today’s increased desire for authenticity and simple, honest nourishment. The campaign features a rather (pardon the term) innovative web site called the Palace of Light that makes a whimsical case against progress.
“The world has progressed at lightening speed over the past 100 years. To a fault, one could argue in light of the times. So it’s both oddly funny and fascinating to consider that Post Original Shredded Wheat, which has used the same single ingredient for over 100 years, ends up being one of the healthiest foods on your grocery shelf.”
In a playful way, the campaign pokes fun at innovation and elevates the current backlash against heavily processed or engineered foods…
“Today we see all sorts of chemically enhanced, artificial fiber-infused, carb-refused cereals — a far stretch from simple, honest nourishment. Post Original Shredded Wheat, on the other hand, hasn’t changed. It is still just one simple, honest ingredient, which naturally comes with fiber, vitamins and minerals. Why would we mess with that?”
That’s become the collective consumer sentiment, don’t mess with my food! During these tough economic times, this humble breakfast food has hit on a perfect storm — familiar childhood favorite, back to basics, value, simple and naturally nutrient rich. How can you beat that?
Tagged as:
natural,
Shredded Wheat,
Simplicity
by Janet on February 9, 2009
Kosher has hit it big. No other claim was used more frequently last year on new foods and beverages, according to Mintel’s Global New Products Database.
“Kosher” was at the top of the list of all new product launches — beating out “all natural” and “no additives or preservatives.” 
Yet food safety was the primary driver, not religion. Research conducted by Mintel indicates that people who purchased kosher products thought they were produced under stricter supervision than what is provided by government inspection. Many thought the kosher symbol guarantees that the food is free of contaminants or disease. (particularly meats).
More than half of the consumers who purchased kosher foods did so because they considered them to be safer than products not certified as kosher.
With foodborne illness outbreaks constantly in the news, it’s no surprise that people are nervous about the safety of the food supply. Yet, this food safety halo over kosher foods may be more perception vs. reality.
Mintel valued the market for kosher-certified foods at $12.5 billion. According to the firm’s database, 4,477 new kosher-certified processed products were launched in the U.S. in 2007, compared to 1,491 in 2205 and 399 in 2003.
Tagged as:
food quality,
Food Safety,
kosher,
labeling,
natural,
nutrition myths,
nutrition trends