From the category archives:

Diet Myths and Misinformation

It seems there’s a always a hot new “miracle” food or supplement that sweeps the country.  Acai used to be the front runner.  Now it appears to be raspberry ketones.  Instead of goji berry, it’s African Mango.  Saffron extract is the new Sensa.

Now there’s a new crop of products promising miraculous fat-burning, belly-blasting results. Increasingly these miracle products are getting their big break on the Dr. Oz show.  Viewers hang on to every word Dr. Oz says and run out immediately after a convincing segment to buy the supplements touted on the show.  Marketers of these pills love to say “endorsed by Dr. Oz”  and his quotes are frequently cited in the ads for these products.  You can find websites now that feature all the supplements that Dr. Oz promotes, a search on Amazon for “Dr. Oz supplements” results in 1,406 listings, and other online supplement sellers categorize their pills according to Dr. Oz recommendations – such as Dr. Oz Weight Loss.

Perhaps no one has helped fuel the sale of  diet supplements more than Dr. Oz.  And that’s a shame.  Dr. Oz is a tremendous communicator and he’s brilliant at translating technical topics into simple, consumer-friendly language.  And how wonderful to have a popular talk show that’s all about health. Unfortunately, his focus has shifted to the glorification of “miracle” pills and his viewers are gobbling it up.  Before you’re tempted to spend your hard-earned money on the next hot thing, here’s what you need to know.

Raspberry Ketones

6997718628_ab69de7168_b

What it is: Natural compounds that give red raspberries their distinct aroma.  Primarily used in the U.S. as a flavoring agent, they’re now bottled up in a pill (typically produced synthetically in a lab) and sold as a weight loss supplement.

What’s the promise: Dr. Oz described raspberry ketones as a “revolutionary metabolism booster that you’ve never heard of”  and a “fat burner in a bottle.”  Marketers sell raspberry ketones in pill and liquid form, claiming that the supplement can stimulate fat loss, inhibit fat absorption and increase fat burning or oxidation.

What you should know: No human clinical trials have been conducted.   The claims are all based on animal or test tube studies from Asia, where raspberry ketones seem to have gotten their start as a weight loss supplement.  It’s important not to jump to major conclusions based on what happens in the body of a rat or inside a test tube.  Most of the supplements add other ingredients, such as caffeine, that provides a stimulant effect.  Read more from Appetite for Health: 5 Things Dr. Oz Didn’t Mention About Raspberry Ketones.

Here’s the segment that got the raspberry ketone frenzy started:

African Mango

6416989011_f9aa17e268_b

7143804583_a1947da7a6_b

What it is: A supplement made from extracts of the seeds of the West African mango known as Irvingia gabonesis.

What’s the promise: The pills are promoted as fat burners, especially belly fat.

What you should know: A study in Cameroon funded by a supplier of African mango supplements did show improvement in body fat among individuals consuming the pills compared to a placebo, but it is far from a miracle pill, particularly if you do nothing else besides take this pill (as promoted on the Dr. Oz show). You’re better off eating real fruit (like the lean West Africans do).

Saffron Extract

SaffronWhat it is: A pill or chew made from extracts of the culinary spice saffron, known as one of the most expensive spices in the word.

What’s the promise: Touted as an appetite suppressant, the supplements claim to control compulsive eating by affecting serotonin levels in the brain.

What you should know:

One study seems to be the basis of the meteoric rise in popularity of saffron supplements, although there are better ways to promote satiety with whole foods rather than pills, and more important things to do if someone is dealing with emotional eating (such as make an appointment with a registered dietitian who specializes in this area).

Here’s Dr. Oz talking about saffron extract. Just listen to the number of times he says “miracle,” “breakthrough,” and “revolutionary.”

What’s especially troubling to me is that this type of sensationalism reinforces a “fix it with a pill” mentality.  Instead of encouraging you to eat, for instance, more fresh raspberries and mangoes, the focus is on popping a pill of these foods.  And typically it’s a small extract of the real thing with other ingredients added in — so who knows how much of this “miraculous” ingredient you’re even getting.  Plus, often it’s a synthetic version of the compound made in a lab. Yes, there are lots of convincing testimonials that get people excited, but these “success stories” on TV or in an ad, are not a sufficient substitute for science.

Steven Charlap, MD, founder of MDPrevent,  is so incensed with what he sees going on every day on the Dr. Oz show that he dissects the dialogue on his blog.  He’s been criticized for taking on Dr. Oz, but here’s his response:

The other day I received a comment in response to something I wrote about the Dr. Oz show. It read, “You don’t challenge a wizard.”  It was an obvious cross-reference between the fictional Wizard in the Wizard of Oz and Dr. Mehmet Oz.  In response, I impulsively wrote, “He’s not a real wizard. He just plays one on TV.”  After writing my response, I started thinking about the similarities behind the Wizard in the Wizard of Oz and the actual Dr. Oz. Unlike the Wizard, Dr. Oz does not hide behind a curtain and use smoke and mirrors to impress his audience. Instead, on an almost daily basis he blatantly engages his audience with new secret cures and potions.  However, both characters do pretend to be something they are not. The Wizard worked hard to create the impression that he was all powerful, which turned out to be an illusion.  Dr. Oz pretends to have magic pills and miracle cures, to have powerful remedies to jump-start diets and create lean bellies, to make wrinkles disappear and treat dementia, which also all turn out to be illusions. So maybe we would all be better off if he actually hid all those supplements behind a curtain.  They say that life sometimes imitates art. Has there ever been a better example than the Dr. Oz show?

All of this chasing the next  big “breakthrough” and “miracle” is distracting.  I agree with Dr. Charlap:

Almost none of the pills Dr. Oz recommends have any real value. There are no magic, miracle, or power pills one can take to stay healthy, and that task mostly remains with us as individuals.  Be grateful that you have the ability to impact your health. The alternative may be far less pleasant.

Once again, it’s the magical thinking that bothers me. Sure, there could be beneficial supplements and aids for helping you lose weight, but these are not miracles in a bottle. It’s a disservice to all of Dr. Oz’s loyal viewers to make it seem like a pill is all you need. It makes everything else seem less important — like eating real foods, being active. I just wish Dr. Oz would channel his brilliance in getting America to cook more at home and to look to whole foods for the miracles. The answer doesn’t lie in a bottle. Dr. Oz is helping to sell a lot of supplements. I just wish he would inspire people to be just as enthusiastic about what they eat.


Raspberry Ketones and African Mango images courtesy of Rich Private Label Nutraceuticals on flickr

{ 2 comments }

A Closer Look at Diabetes Myths

by Janet on February 3, 2012

pauladeen diabeetusNow that the recent Paula Deen brouhaha is past us, what can we learn from it? 

To me, the positive outcome is the attention it’s brought to the role of diet in managing type 2 diabetes. No amount of medication (even $500-a-month injections) can override careless eating.

Yet, what people  need to eat if they do have diabetes is not as restricted as many folks think.  

Sure, it’s probably best to forgo Paula’s famous bacon and egg burger that’s sandwiched between  two glazed donuts or skip her deep-fried mac n’ cheese, but a ‘diabetic diet’ (an outdated term no longer used) is not all that different from the basic tenets of healthy eating. paula deen burger

Now experts say people with diabetes should follow the same type of eating plan as the rest of us, with an emphasis on fiber-filled whole grains, fruits, vegetables, lean protein, low-fat dairy, and ‘good’ fats.

Even so, there’s been no shortage of  sugar-free, diabetes-friendly foods showing up in supermarkets.  Yet some experts I talked to believe the growing popularity of ‘diabetic foods’ simply perpetuates a myth.  That was the topic of my latest post for WebMD’s  Real Life Nutrition.  Hope you’ll check it out and leave a comment.

One of the experts I consulted was registered dietitian Hope Warshaw, a certified diabetes educator and author of the American Diabetes Association’s book Diabetes Meal Planning Made Easy.

“What is a diabetic food?  There are no special foods that people with diabetes need to eat.  We do a disservice to people by having them think they need to run out and buy special foods.”

Warshaw says the nutrition recommendations for people with diabetes are the same as the general public – no rigid diet and no need to go low-carb or limit your selections to sugar-free foods. In fact, the no-sugar myth is one of the biggest misconceptions about diabetes, according to registered dietitians Karen Chalmers and Amy Campbell, authors of the American Diabetes Association’s book 16 Myths of a Diabetic Diet. This easy-to-read book busts the most common myths about diabetes and cleverly compares the old and new methods for managing the disease.

Sugar has always been intrinsically linked to diabetes. It was even referred to as ‘sugar diabetes’ in the past because people mistakenly believed that eating too much sugar was the cause. For years, people with diabetes were advised to eliminate all sweets to avoid overloading the blood with glucose. Now researchers recognize that sugar has an impact on blood glucose that’s similar to other carbohydrate-containing foods. Today’s emphasis is on keeping track of total carbohydrates rather than strictly avoiding all sugar.

Even if all carbohydrates impact blood glucose levels in similar ways, they do differ nutritionally. Experts still advise choosing whole grains, fruits, vegetables and legumes – in place of concentrated sweets or ‘simple’ carbs. Sugary foods and beverages can add a lot of empty calories and make it more difficult to maintain a healthy weight, which is important for managing type 2 diabetes.

So that’s where some sugar-free options that contain minimal calories (particularly beverages) can be helpful. However, some of the products on the market may not be as beneficial as people think. Many sugar-free candies, cookies, cakes and ice creams contain nearly the same amount of calories and carbohydrates as their real-sugar counterparts. That’s particularly true for sugar-free foods made with polyols or sugar alcohols (such as sorbitol, mannitol and xylitol).

Diabetes cookbooks are changing to reflect the new thinking and you’ll start to see books that no longer have such a heavy reliance on artificial sweeteners. One example is Jackie Newgent’s The All-Natural Diabetes Cookbook, which uses real sugar in recipes and emphasizes unprocessed, whole-food ingredients.

You can even have your favorite comfort food if you have diabetes, as demonstrated in the American Diabetes Association’s latest book The Diabetes Comfort Food Cookbook by culinary nutritionist Robyn Webb. The book features lasagna, meat loaf, mac n’ cheese, and cake — along with the message: “Just a tweak here and there and familiar foods can remain favorites, guilt-free, and enjoyed every day.”

Maybe Paula Deen won’t have to make so many changes after all. But a few tweaks would certainly be good.

Images courtesy of Jeff Houck and Yummies 4 Tummies on flickr.

{ 3 comments }

Five Nutrition Mistakes Not to Make in 2012

by Janet on January 5, 2012

scalePerhaps you’re inspired to make some personal changes in the new year. That’s great – as long as you have a plan in place to make it happen.

Losing weight tends to top the resolution lists for lots of folks.  If that’s your goal, just be sure to stack the deck in your favor so the changes you make stick and you achieve long-term success.

That’s the topic of my latest post for WebMD.  I wrote about  five D’s that could derail your efforts.  Avoiding these D’s could help you avoid another big D — feeling defeated.

To read more, check out WebMD’s Real Life Nutrition blog.

[image courtesy of Life Design Strategies on flickr]

{ 7 comments }

When Did ‘Skinny’ Become the New Ideal?

by Janet on January 2, 2012

3518817221_464f7e6034_b

I recently heard a radio commercial for a diet pill that promised to get you “high school skinny.” It just struck me how often I’m hearing the word “skinny” these days. When did skinny become the new ideal?

So many of the popular diet books seem to have skinny in the title. Have you noticed?  Perhaps the trend got started a few years ago with the success of Skinny Bitch, which is a vegan book that sparked an entire line of skinny books and products. Now you can read about the Secrets of Skinny Chicks and Unleash Your Inner Skinny while wearing your skinny jeans and sipping a skinny latte or Skinnygirl Margarita. If you’re hungry, you can grab a Skinny Cow ice cream or skinny protein bar.  The skinny marketing trend has even jumped over to the beauty aisle with skinny shampoos and skinny lotions.

Skinny is everywhere. It has certainly become a mega-empire for the Skinnygirl herself, Bethenny Frankel, who’s making a bundle with her Skinnygirl cocktails, books and other products.  Maybe skinny helps sell a lot of books and a lot of booze, but I still don’t like it. I think it sends the wrong message. That was the topic of my latest blog post for WebMD. To read more, please check out Real Life Nutrition.

Image courtesy of Shira Golding on flickr

{ 6 comments }

6 Nutrition Claims That Need a Second Look

by Janet on November 2, 2011

5782038776_fc5faae3c4_bAll eyes have been on front-of-package nutrition labeling recently, with the release of the Institute of Medicine’s recommendations to help bring some consistency to front-of-pack systems. That’s great if we can unify the various efforts that call out nutritional attributes on packaged foods. Not sure if these new recommendations totally nailed it, but this is certainly an issue worth tackling.

What you see on the front of the label, however, is never going to be the full story. It’s still important to turn the package around and look at the Nutrition Facts panel that provides more detailed data on what’s inside. Consumers say they’re reading these labels, but an interesting study published in the November issue of the Journal of the American Dietetic Association begs to differ. Researchers at the University of Minnesota used an eye-tracking device to see if shoppers were truly scouring those nutrition labels like they said they were.

The shoppers said one thing, but their eyes said another. Among the 203 study participants, 33% said they always look at the calories on the nutrition label, yet the eye-tracking tracking device found that only 9% actually checked the calories. Only 1% looked at other components on the label, even though they said they almost always look at total fat (31%), trans fat (20%), sugar (24%) and serving size (26%).

What shoppers do tend to look at are the nutrition claims on the front of a package. And that’s the topic of my latest post on the WebMD’s blog Real Life Nutrition.  I wrote about the 6 claims that need a second look before you toss the products into your shopping cart.

  • Trans fat free. Just because you see the words “trans fat free’ on the label is doesn’t mean the food is healthy. It could still be high in saturated fat or have lots of empty calories. Turn the package around to see what you’re really buying. If you see the word “hydrogenated” in the ingredient list, there could be some trans fats. A label can declare “zero grams” if there’s less than ½ gram per serving. So consider how many servings you might be eating. The trans fats can add up quickly.
  • Made with whole grains. Look for the words “100% whole grain” or check the ingredient list for the words “whole” in front of wheat or other grains. Made with whole grains could mean made with very little. Some of the grains inside may be whole, but it could be as little as 5 percent.
  • No high fructose corn syrup. This is no indication of the amount of sugar that’s in the food or beverage you’re about to buy. And just because you see a so-called “natural” sugar like agave nectar, there’s no real nutritional advantage unless the overall sugar content is reduced.
  • Omega 3. When you see omega-3 touted on a food label (and it’s not fish) it’s likely ALA omega 3. Unless you see the words EPA or DHA, or you spot fish oil or algal oil in the ingredient list, it’s safe to assume that you’re only getting ALA – especially when the product contains flax, soybean oil or canola oil. That’s fine, but you should know that not all omega-3s are created equal. Our bodies need to convert ALA to the more potent DHA or EPA omega 3 that’s found in fish (and less than 10% is typically converted). You might be getting less of these beneficial fatty acids than you think.
  • Detox. This has become an uber trendy term, but it’s basically meaningless. However, you’ll find it featured on the front of the label of protein bars, juices, teas and other beverages.
  • Natural. It’s the big buzz word on package labels and there was even a recent food fight with the FDA to determine if high fructose corn syrup really qualifies as natural. Other companies have gotten their hands slapped for playing the natural card. We’re arguing over technicalities and the word has lost all meaning. I think if a food wasn’t actually plucked from a tree or grown from the ground, then it shouldn’t claim to be natural.

So what does this all mean? Go beyond the trendy words on the front of the package and check the nutrition facts and ingredients on the back to know what you’re really buying. Keep your eyes wide open when evaluating claims.

Image via libertygraceO on flickr

{ 3 comments }

4207677152_9634680793_oThat’s the question posed in a debate during a provocative session at the American Dietetic Association’s Food & Nutrition Conference & Expo last week in San Diego.  In one corner was John Foreyt, PhD,  a prominent obesity researcher at Baylor College of Medicine.  In the other corner was Linda Bacon, PhD, a nutrition researcher at the University of California-Davis and author of Health at Every Size: The Surprising Truth About Your Weight. She also heads up a Health At Every Size Community and speaks throughout the country about her HAES approach — which she calls the new peace movement.

We’ve lost the war on obesity. Fighting fat hasn’t made the fat go away. And being thinner, even if we knew how to successfully accomplish it, will not necessarily make us healthier or happier. The war on obesity has taken its toll. Extensive “collateral damage” has resulted: Food and body preoccupation, self-hatred, eating disorders, discrimination, poor health… Few of us are at peace with our bodies, whether because we’re fat or because we fear becoming fat. It’s time to withdraw the troops.

This was certainly one of the more lively sessions at this year’s conference, and I’m so glad I attended (sitting next to my friend and colleague Marsha Hudnall, author of the blog A Weight Lifted.). However, I’m afraid at the end of the 1-1/2 hours, the sides were more divided than ever and we (the audience) were left a bit wounded on the battlefield.  I think we have more to gain by working together than fighting with each other.

Here’s a blog post that gives the backstory of the session and a clip of Linda Bacon talking about her approach so you can get a better idea of what I’m talking about:

Each debater scored some points. Each one lost a few rounds. They both did a good job of discounting the other’s point of view, but the debate format made it challenging to adequately address the topic.  I’m not even sure this should have been a debate. But it was….and here’s how I thought it played out.

Round 1 Winner: John Foreyt
I don’t think it serves Linda Bacon’s position well to deny the health consequences of obesity. She spent so much of her time sharing data that the obese live just as long as normal weight individuals and downplaying the health risks of being obese. Why go there? I think that’s why some people just shut down and never hear what this movement is all about. You’re right, Linda, perhaps this shouldn’t be “war,” but I don’t see how you can dismiss the health risks associated with obesity. And there are certainly quality of life issues (not being able to play with your kids, ride a bike, etc.). I just don’t think this is the question we should be asking. Our priority should be discussing what we do about obesity — not debating if there’s even a problem.

Round 2 Winner: Linda Bacon
I think John Foreyt shocked the audience when he dismissed mindful or intuitive eating — and even said it was the reason why we have an obesity problem in America. He lost me on that. I actually think that’s the missing equation in so many weight loss programs. The emphasis should be on health — and how to achieve it. Teaching people the principles of mindful eating — honoring our body’s signals of hunger and fulness, not making judgments of our choices, and choosing pleasureable foods that help you feel good — are all positive things. I agree that it’s all about adopting healthy habits, not dieting. But sometimes this movement takes a militant approach and people think it’s all about “fat acceptance.” Yes, we need to embrace size diversity, but the real value of this approach is sometimes lost because people assume that it means throwing in the towel and giving up.

Round 3 Winner: Tie
At the end of the session, they both made good points. I believe in small changes and long-term weight loss can be sustainable (as Foreyt said), but I do think that most traditional attempts at dieting can do more harm than good (as Bacon reinforced). I liked so many things that Linda Bacon had to say, but I think her statements about “the best way to win the war against fat is to give up the fight” are being misinterpreted. I think it’s more about being happy at every size, and letting go of past approaches to dieting. This movement is quickly gaining ground, and an increasing number of dietitians are embracing the HAES approach. But I think it’s important for people to get past the immediate reaction that these are “obesity doubters” (as Foreyt described) or simply fat acceptors. It’s really all about a healthy lifestyle. Restrictive diets don’t work…but people need guidance on what they should do instead. It’s not enough to say diets don’t work. I think we need to bring these opposing points of view together. I fully agree with the woman in the audience who asked the last question during the session. She ended with “why can’t you both kiss and make up?”

Good question.

If you’re interested in learning more about HAES, here are the handouts that Linda Bacon provided to support her presentation at FNCE.

[Scale image courtesy of flickr user brightcd]

{ 30 comments }

I Call It Like I See It

by Janet on August 24, 2011

4945236568_530b409476_bI have opinions. And I express them here on Nutrition Unplugged. That’s the “food news and views” part of my blog title. I want you to express your opinions, too. A blog is an ideal forum for these exchange of ideas.

There will be times when we disagree. This has happened quite a bit, actually. But that’s fine. How I see it, you have a right to your own opinion. You don’t have a right to your own facts. And that’s where I draw the line.

I was recently the target of a rather aggressive Twitter challenge by a nutrition colleague. It appears that he disagrees with my list of food trends that I think have jumped the shark (specifically chia seeds), and he feels that I’ve dismissed fermented foods while extolling only certain fermented foods: wine, beer and sausage. Not sure he even read what I wrote very closely. I’m fascinated by fermentation (it’s an amazing ancient technique) and I recognize many of the benefits, but I do think that some of the claims made by fermentation enthusiasts are ahead of the science. And while chia seeds are certainly a healthy ingredient, they’re no miracle food. The claims have simply gone too far. Does it mean not eat chia seeds? Of course not. I never said that. Enjoy chia seeds, flaxseeds, sesame seeds, hemp seeds — whatever seeds you like. Seeds and nuts are great foods to eat more often. I simply feel that the marketing of chia seeds is overblown — to me, it’s jumped the shark.  Regarding fermentation, my critic complained about my mention of sausage because he’s a vegan (can’t we respect each others eating styles?).

If I respect your opinion, why not respect mine. I understand the facts. I’m expressing my opinion — which is a combination of how the facts are being interpreted and how the products are being marketed. I think it’s important to distinguish between facts and opinions. If I get the facts wrong, tell me. If you disagree with my opinion, it’s fine to tell me too, but don’t tell me I got it wrong. That’s my opinion.

One person’s savior is another person’s hype.

photo credit: kerry.com on Flickr

{ 12 comments }

Five Food Trends That Have Jumped The Shark

by Janet on August 9, 2011

Sometimes food trends have just gone too far.  They’ve jumped the shark.

If that reference escapes you, then maybe you’re not a fan of Happy Days (or you’re simply too young).  The term “jumped the shark” goes back to a 1977 episode of this popular TV show2312730966_21acc3f82d when a leather jacket-clad Fonzie was water skiing and literally jumped over a shark in the water.  

That was a watershed moment, if you will.  At that point on, the show went downhill and was eventually cancelled.

You can see for yourself:

Jumping the shark even has its own Wikipedia definition to describe a point in time that marks a decline in quality that is beyond recovery. Jon Hein, creator of the now defunct website jumptheshark.com explains the concept:

“It’s a moment. A defining moment when you know that your favorite television program has reached its peak. That instant that you know from now on…it’s all downhill. Some call it the climax. We call it ‘Jumping the Shark.’ From that moment on, the program will simply never be the same.”

So as a lover of pop culture, I’m fascinated at how this TV reference has come to mean anything that just goes too far.  I think some food trends have had their “jumped the shark” moments.  Maybe it started out with good intentions, but things got carried away.  The hype just took over. These are the five trends that remind me of Fonzie.

1. Bacon

jones-bacon-soda1-e1290165948695

Don’t get me wrong, I love bacon.  But does everything need to contain bacon?  And must it be candied, covered in chocolate, in our drinks, our snacks, chapstick and even baby formula (OK, that part was hoax).  One recent survey identified bacon as the #1 food trend that people wanted to see less.   I agree.

2. Agave Nectar

4565568299_a2ebd04298_z

Agave nectar is riding high as a natural sweetener, embraced by vegans and lovers of raw food.  It’s sugar.  In fact, agave nectar is not too different from high fructose corn syrup (although it contains even more fructose).  Yes, it comes from the agave plant, but it’s still a refined sugar.  Enjoy it in moderation, but don’t let the health halo blind you.

3. Chia Seeds

4057296326_78668abb85_b

I like seeds, and chia seeds are just fine — but they’re not a miracle food. (See previous post) I  don’t think you need chia seed supplements or go out of your way to incorporate spoonfuls in everything you eat.  Yes, chia seeds contain omega-3s, but only about as much as a bite of salmon.  Go ahead and enjoy chia seeds (along with flaxseed, sesame and other seeds), just don’t let them distract you from eating more seafood or incorporating more fruits, vegetables and whole grains into your diet.

4. Antioxidants

splenda antioxidants

To me, the antioxidant trend has gone too far with the fortification of artificial sugar.  New Splenda Essentials are fortified with 20% of Daily Value of vitamin C and E “like those found in fruits and vegetables.”  Splenda will never be like fruits and vegetables.  Why even try?
5. Acai

acai-pure-cleanse

This nice little purple berry from South America just went too far almost from the beginning.  You could never even find this fresh fruit anywhere.  It was typically the pulp in juices, sweetened teas and other foods — then supplements.  And then the claims got carried away really quickly.   How did this all even happen?

What trends do you think have jumped the shark?

[photo credits on flickr.com: agave nectar from Elana's Pantry, Chia from jerushy44]

{ 20 comments }

The Wonderful Lychee Fruit Gets Hijacked

by Janet on January 30, 2011

2317926209_77ebaf95fa

Lychee fruit by SUJA on flickr

Oh, no.  Here we go again.  Lychee fruits may be the new Acai.  This exotic fruit from China and Southeast Asia has became increasingly popular in the last few years — showing up in juices and energy drinks, on restaurant menus and mixed in martinis.  In fact, the Lychee martini craze is still going strong.

2408184831_698b1c08d4Lychee-Lemongrass Martini by Colin Purrington on flickr
lychee salsa on oystersLychee salsa on oysters by Augustus Gloop on flickr 

2694953901_a5362d16bb_o

Lychee Clafoutis by Appetite for China on flickr

Soon lychee gained status as a superfruit — fueled by a Journal of Nutrition study that found lychees contained the second highest amounts of polyphenols of all the fruits tested.  Lychees were found to have 15% more heart-healthy polyphenols compared to grapes.

It was only a matter of time before the next step in the cycle (following in acai’s myth-riddled path):  a lychee supplement.  That’s exactly what we have now with the launch of  the Lichi Super Fruit Diet.  Here’s a press release from the New York-based company Bainbridge & Knight that saw an opportunity to jump on the lychee bandwagon.  I first learned about these new herbal supplements last week when I heard an ad on the radio here in Chicago and wanted to learn more.  I couldn’t believe what I was hearing — lose weight, boost metabolism, melt fat and detox.  

Here’s a link to LichiSuperFruit.com where you can learn more about the $29.99 supplements that contain lychee fruit extract, acai, resveratrol and green tea extracts.  The products just launched in November and the company plans to support with a national ad campaign, so I’m sure you’ll be hearing more about the Lichi Super Fruit Diet if you haven’t already.lichi super fruitWhy can’t we just enjoy the fruit?  Why must every trendy food get turned into a dietary supplement?  You simply cannot capture all of the benefits of a whole food into a pill.  I don’t care that these supplements contain 17 different ingredients designed to burn fat.  Eat real fruit, drink a cup of  real green tea. 

Products like this always try to align with research so you’ll believe the products are science-based and the claims credible.  Typically there’s some link to research that gets the ball rolling.  But just because a food may be worthy of praise, doesn’t mean a pill filled with an extract of that food has any merit (and there’s likely little actual lychee inside). 

There’s a Japanese company that sells a lychee dietary supplement and it funded a study that seems to be the foundation of the burn fat. claim: lychee extract may trim waist fat.  However, this is not sufficient evidence to me that lychee supplements are worth spending money on. 

I like the idea of a lychee super fruit lifestyle — but only a lifestyle that includes real lychee fruits and other whole fruits and vegetables.  Products like this are only a distraction.  

{ 10 comments }

Sensa Diet (Still) Smells Fishy To Me

by Janet on December 15, 2010

I wrote about these “diet sprinkles” over a year ago, but I thought it was a topic worth revisiting.

I happened to catch a Sensa infomerical on late night TV recently and I couldn’t believe the program was still around — and seemingly going strong.  I don’t blame people for getting swept away by the dramatic weight loss claims.  The testimonials are rather convincing: simply sprinkle the flavor-enhancing crystals on everything you eat, sniff it before eating and the pounds will melt away.

But I sure hope you’ll save your money.


Before you’re tempted to buy Sensa, please read my original post:

Sensa Diet Smells Fishy to Me

And take a look at what others had to say about Sensa and the claims made by “Dr. Smell,” the creator Alan Hirsch.  What’s really incredible to me is what Hirsch told ABC after being pressed. For his so-called clinical study (which has never been published) there actually wasn’t a control group that used fake sprinkles to compare with the group that used Sensa (and experienced  this dramatic, self-reported weight loss).  He said the promotional company made that up for the video.  “Obviously a misunderstanding,” Hirsch admitted.

Enough said.

WebMD – The Truth About Sensa
ABC News – Eat Ice Cream, Burgers and Pizza and Still Lose Weight?
The Fit Shack – Sensa: 5 Reasons It Won’t Work
Henry the Health Hound – My Investigation on Sensa for Weight Loss

Related Posts with Thumbnails

{ 10 comments }