From the category archives:

Children's Nutrition

2415431935_87116cdddf

photo credit:  Axel Buhrmann on flickr

Mothers contribute so much to the world.  We have a lot to thank them for.  One contribution that is especially meaningful to me is the impact moms have as nutrition role models.

Research shows that a mother’s own food and beverage choices are the single greatest influence on what her child eats and drinks — more influential than any other attempt she tries to make.   So the idea of “do what I say, not what I do” won’t work when it comes to food.

Brian Wansink, director of the Food and Brand Lab at Cornell, talks about moms as nutrition gatekeepers. His research shows that nutrition gatekeepers influence over 70 percent of the foods we eat.  They impact the decisions of their children and spouse, both inside and outside the home. They’re the ones who purchase and prepare food, pack children’s lunches, select the snacks and choose the restaurants. That’s a huge amount of influence and a big responsibility!

A gatekeeper who struggles with unhealthy habits and eating choices will typically pass those problems on to family members. By the same token, gatekeepers who improve their habits can improve the health of the whole family.

Wansink describes moms’ role this way:

M = Manager:  Managing multiple appetites, food preferences and eating behaviors.

O = Official Observer:  Observing the eating habits of the family to determine which may need some adjusting.

M = Master Marketer:  Preparing and “marketing” healthy foods in the household.  Moms prepare nutritious meals and help make them appetizing and appealing to the family.

It’s been said that mothers may be the most important health care system in the world. I buy that.

Hope you’ll salute the nutrition gatekeepers in your life this Mother’s Day.

{ 1 comment }

March is National Nutrition Month, an annual celebration sponsored by the American Dietetic Association. OK, I have to admit.  As dietitians, we get really excited about this.  It’s our month to shine the spotlight on the power of healthy eating and raise awareness of the unique contributions of the registered dietitian.

This year’s theme is Eat Right With Color, which is a tremendous concept.  Color is one of the most reliable cues to nutrient-rich foods – or at least when it comes to fruits and vegetables.  I think we’ll be hearing lots more about the importance of eating a variety of colors.

Eat Right With Color was the topic of my Kids’ Table column in the Chicago Tribune, which you’ll find here and reprinted below.

The Kids’ Table:   Better Nutrition at the End of the Rainbow

March is National Nutrition Month, an annual celebration sponsored by the American Dietetic Association. This year’s theme, Eat Right With Color, seems especially relevant for kids. All too often, children eat a rather beige diet, dominated by chicken nuggets, french fries, macaroni and cheese, and white bread.

Adding color to their plates not only makes the meal more visually appealing, but the varied hues also help boost the nutritional power of what you serve, says registered dietitian and dietetic association spokeswoman Karen Ansel.

Color is one of the best cues of nutritional density — and the darker, the better. Well, that’s true as long as the vibrant tints are natural and not due to artificial coloring. All bets are off if you’re talking about neon-blue juice drinks or bright-pink breakfast cereal.

Beyond those obvious exceptions, color is a reliable way to decipher nutritional value. Brightly colored fruits and vegetables contain plant compounds or phytonutrients that provide the distinctive shade that you see and specific health benefits you may not even know about.

Each color provides something different. Eating well means much more than having different food groups at every meal. It’s important to keep track of colors too. Have kids look for a rainbow on their plates.

purple cauliflower

mongolbbq on flickr

Blue/purple

Dark-colored fruits and vegetables are good sources of anthocyanins, the purplish phytonutrient that put blueberries on the map as a superfood. Other blue and purple foods offer similar benefits.

Choices: Purple grapes, plums, raisins, dried plums, purple asparagus, purple cabbage, purple carrots, eggplant, purple potatoes and purple cauliflower

orange pumpkins katong kate

Yellow/orange

You’ll find ample amounts of antioxidants, such as vitamin C and beta carotene (vitamin A) in yellow and orange fruits and vegetables.

Choices: Apricots, cantaloupe, mangoes, oranges, tangerines, butternut squash, carrots, pumpkin, sweet potatoes

red peppers lidia camacho

Red

Red is a flag for such health-promoting compounds as lycopene and anthocyanins. The darker and richer the tones, the more phytonutrients you’ll get in return.

Choices: Cherries, cranberries, red grapes, raspberries, strawberries, watermelon, beets, red peppers, tomatoes

green vegetables- k miyuki

k.miyuki on flickr

Green

Green is a signal for chlorophyll, and green vegetables are potent in folate and such phytonutrients as carotenoids, lutein and indoles. Dark, leafy greens such as spinach and kale are richer in nutrients than paler iceberg lettuce.

Choices: Asparagus, broccoli, Brussels sprouts, green beans, leafy greens, peas, snow peas, spinach, zucchini

To help families year-round with ideas on how to improve children’s diets, the ADA recently launched a new campaign called Kids Eat Right. Learn more at kidseatright.org.

{ 10 comments }

Are Covert Veggies a Good Approach?

by Janet on February 9, 2011

One way to get kids to eat their vegetables is to hide them –   a stealth approach popularized a few years ago by Jessica Seinfeld and Missy Chase Lapine.  

Perhaps you remember the lawsuit over veggie plagiarism between the sneaky and deceptive authors.  

hiding vegetables
photo credit: wudzy on flickr

Hiding vegetables was the topic of my kids’ table column today in the Chicago Tribune.  Hope you’ll check it out and let me know what you think.

Is it ok to disguise veggies?  Do all forms count?  Does the deception trouble you? Or do what it takes?

{ 8 comments }

The big trend in food:  vegetables.

Yes, vegetables are the new meat, declares New York Magazine.

At serious restaurants all over town, carrots, peas, and the like are no longer just the supporting cast—they’re the stars. Move over locavores, here come the vegivores…a term that connotes fervid vegetable love rather than ardent meat hate. It’s a subtle but important distinction.  For the vegivore, a vegetable can occupy the center of the plate, with meat adding flavor or functioning as a condiment.

The cover of November’s Food & Wine exclaims “Vegetables: the next big trend.”  Vegetables are featured in the magazine’s Trendspotting column that highlights the growing number of vegetable-centric restaurants, including upscale eateries that have embraced Meatless Mondays such as Dovetail in New York City and Nage Bistro in Washington, DC.

2552888875_a5482a9df5

La Tartine Gourmande on flickr.com

Famed chef Mario Batali has been a major champion of Meatless Monday and a visible vegetable supporter.   He introduced the world to a ”vegetable butcher” at his Italian mega-market Eataly and has plans to write a vegetarian cookbook.

4961739842_10e759e4fb

Eataly in NYC by Sam 86 on flickr.com

Certainly the vegetable movement got a major boost with the groundbreaking of the White House garden.  Now we’ve seen the Iron Chef’s  first vegetarian competition and Sotheby’s held its first heirloom-vegetable auction.

Indeed, vegetables have become devotional objects.  But why do so many people not eat them…or certainly not enough of them.

CARROT STILL LIFE

Sidious sid on flickr.com

Just this week a new report released by the National Fruit & Vegetable Alliance reveals how bad the situation really is.  Only 6% of individuals in this country meet daily recommendations  for vegetables.  Teenage and adult vegetable consumption even went down over the past 5 years.  The report gives both groups a grade of F.  Children under age 6 aren’t doing much better.  Vegetable consumption grew 3%; yet despite this small increase, 92% of children fail to eat enough vegetables.

Yes, that’s alarming.  It’s even more alarming when you think about the health implications of a veggie-poor diet.  The new report estimates that the economic cost of not eating vegetables is about $56 million — attributed to the health care cost of treating diet-related diseases such as cancer, heart disease and stroke.

Maybe making vegetables trendy will help adults eat more. But what’s the solution for raising veggie-loving kids?  How do we get a new generation excited about vegetables?

I think one way NOT to do it is to hide or sneak them in.

What are your tips for helping your kids like their veggies?  I’ll do a follow-up post featuring your advice.

{ 13 comments }

Man-cooking-meal-in-a-fry-001

Happy Father’s Day to all the dads.  Hope you enjoy your special day — you deserve it!  And while we’re thinking about all the contributions dads make to the family, there’s one  more to consider. What if dads could be a solution to our country’s childhood obesity problem?  What if dads spent more time in the kitchen to help restore the family meal — which many experts believe holds the key to battling childhood obesity.

That’s the focus of my article for MSNBC.com entitled Dad, it’s your turn to cook dinner.  Hope you’ll check it out and let me know what you think.  Maybe even leave a comment on MSNBC.com if you’re so inspired. Some of the comments have been critical.  Ouch. Some people feel like I’m busting the chops of fathers or calling them lazy.  No way.  That’s not the intent at all.

I was inspired by an article written by Michael Pollan The Food Movement, Rising in the New York Review of Books.  Pollan eloquently discusses the rise of food activism in this country — including the locavore movement, critiques of “industrial food,” school lunch reform, and efforts to regulate food ingredients and marketing, especially to kids.  Indeed, there are a lot of movements going on.  Yet with all this intense focus on food, we’re cooking at home less than ever.

In his article, Pollan makes a strong case that the American family meal is threatened — partly because women are busy with full-time jobs outside the home, but also because “foodwork” is under appreciated in today’s world.  The full benefits to the family and society overall are not being recognized, he wrote.

9780252076732One of the books that Pollan features in his article is The Taste for Civilization:  Food, Politics and Civil Society by Janet A. Flammang, a political science professor at Santa Clara University.

In a challenge to second-wave feminists who urged women to get out of the kitchen, Flammang suggests that by denigrating “foodwork” — everything involved in putting meals on the family table — we have unthinkingly wrecked one of the nurseries of democracy: the family meal.

In her book, Flammang addresses the gendered responsibilities for foodwork and argues that we need to change our current views of kitchen duties.

If foodwork continues to be regarded as invisible, unacknowledged and female-only, then the quality of all our lives suffers.

Flammang suggests that:

American women are having second thoughts about having left the kitchen. However, the answer is not for them to simply to return to it, at least not alone, but rather for everyone — men, women and children — to go back to the kitchen, as in preindustrial days, and for the workplace to lessen its time demands on people.

Certainly, it appears that the weight and health of our children are at stake.  Studies have repeatedly shown that kids who eat at home with their families have better quality diets and healthier weights.  Meals prepared and eaten at home are almost always more nutritious than restaurant fare — typically more balanced and lower in calories, fat and sodium.  Harvard researchers found that the more time a nation devotes to food preparation at home, the lower its rate of obesity.

But it seems that no one is cooking at home?

A new published in the American Journal of Epidemiology found that moms who work full-time are more likely to have overweight or obese kids.  The U.K. researchers believe fewer family meals may be one of the contributing factors.

So it seems like a lot of blame is being put on working moms.  That’s what I don’t like.  I don’t want moms to feel guilty.  And I want both parents to appreciate the value of the family meal.  The solution is for everyone to pitch in — moms, dads and even children.

I happen to know a lot of guys who take charge of cooking duties at home.  But overall in this country, most of the day-to-day cooking falls to the mom.  Research by The NPD Group indicates that only 13% of meals eaten at home are prepared by men (although younger men are more likely to pick up a slotted spoon and cozy up to the stove compared to older men).

Maybe more dads will get into cooking with the sudden appearance of cooking magazines, TV shows, websites and blogs devoted to the male cook.  I just hope they inspire men to do more every day cooking, not just the weekend ritual of grilling steak or flipping burgers.

ManTestedRecipes deenbrothersmag10

Cooking for Dads

Real Men Cook Too

Men in Aprons

Deen Bros. Good Cooking

{ 12 comments }

IMG_0824I’m a firm believer in the power of cooking.

I think it’s truly one of the  best ways we can all take better control of our health.

How can you really eat right if you don’t learn to cook?

How can we implement all of today’s dietary guidelines without making our own meals — or at least more often.

But do most people in this country have the confidence they need in the kitchen?  Or have we seen culinary literacy decline to the point that people are lost without a heavy reliance on foods in a package or take-out container.

That’s the focus of my article in the Chicago Tribune: Make This Recipe and Call Me In the Morning.

I was inspired to write this article after attending the Healthy Kitchens, Healthy Lives conference at the Culinary Insitute of America at Greystone.  Maybe you remember me writing about this culinary conference for health professionals, which is a joint project of the CIA and Harvard Medical School.

The conference was spearhead by David M. Eisenberg, MD (pictured above), who is the director of the division of research and education in complementary and integrative medical therapies for Harvard Medical School.  This doc is  on a mission to get America cooking – and he wants physicians to be major evangelists for this movement.  He believes cooking — and appreciating good quality food in a mindful manner — may be the best long-term solution to help America battle obesity and chronic medical conditions.

get_cooking_cover_300One of the speakers during this 3-day conference was Mollie Katzen, who I also interviewed for my Chicago article.  Mollie is undoubtedly one of my earliest food influencers.

Who doesn’t adore her classic Moosewood cookbook…which was the first cookbook I remember buying.

Now she’s written a new book called “Get Cooking: 150 Simple Recipes to Get You Started in the Kitchen “(Harper Collins, 2009).  She told me that she was urged to write the book by her grown children who are now living on their own.

She said her kids could recite the names of all these celebrity chefs but they didn’t know how to roast a chicken.  Mollie said:

We may be living in a culture that is highly culinary aware, yet this “food as entertainment” trend has not taught people to cook.  There’s a skill set that has been lost.

That’s so true.

As a registered dietitian, I think it’s really important to go beyond talking about grams of fat, % of calories and milligrams of nutrients.  We can’t just urge people to eat more fruits, vegetables and whole grains or shop the perimeter of the grocery store and avoid processed foods without arming them with the culinary skills they need to implement this advice.  Culinary training and nutrition education should be joined at the hip.   And that’s what this CIA conference was really all about.

Hope you enjoy my article, which is reprinted below:

Copyright (c) 2010, Chicago Tribune http://www.chicagotribune.com/

Make this recipe and call me in the morning
Doctors hope to fight obesity by teaching patients how to cook healthfully

By Janet Helm, Special to Tribune Newspapers

Copyright, Chicago Tribune Copyright, Chicago Tribune

Imagine the day your doctor hands you a recipe instead of a prescription. Or what if hospitals were equipped with teaching kitchens where patients could trade in their hospital gowns for aprons before being discharged.

That’s the vision of Dr. David Eisenberg, who is on a mission to get America cooking. And he wants doctors to be the major drivers of the movement.

Eisenberg, who heads up the complementary and integrative medicine division at Harvard Medical School, forged a partnership with the Culinary Institute of America to help physicians get more comfortable in the kitchen.

The culinary conferences that he helps lead are not simply to encourage doctors to get in touch with their inner Julia Child. It’s to arm them with the knowledge and skills they need to inspire their patients to start cooking – which Eisenberg believes is one of best strategies to battle obesity and chronic medical conditions in this country.

“We need to first teach the teachers,” he said. “A physician’s own behavior is one of the strongest predictors of how they’ll counsel their patients.”

That’s why Eisenberg wants to see physicians roll up their sleeves and start cooking.

Then he wants doctors to transfer their passion for good food to their patients – who he said often feel overwhelmed at the thought of getting dinner on the table.

Culinary literacy has plummeted in this country, Eisenberg said. “Many people simply don’t have basic cooking skills.”

We’ve been going back to our homes for meals, but how we’re preparing food is quite different compared to a generation ago, according to Harry Balzer, chief industry analyst with the NPD Group and author of Eating Patterns in America. The definition of cooking has changed, he said.  Now it’s more likely to mean assembling and heating – and probably in the microwave, which has experienced a surge in popularity in the past few years, along with frozen foods.

For the first time, the lasagna eaten at home is more likely to be thawed from the freezer rather than made from scratch. If food doesn’t come in a box with instructions, many people are just not sure what to do.

While they may constantly hear about the virtues of fresh, whole and unprocessed food, and are told to eat more vegetables, whole grains and plant-based meals, people often feel ill-equipped to implement this advice.

Even with the wildly popular television cooking shows, many people are not active in their own kitchens.

Has cooking become a spectator sport? That’s what  Robyn Webb is worried about. “Food has become so glamorized, but the basic skills are missing.”

Webb is one of a growing number of culinary dietitians who combine nutrition counseling with hands-on cooking instructions. She works with clients in their own kitchens in the Washington, D.C., area to help them buy and prepare nutritious meals.

“It’s not enough to tell people to eat 20 grams of this or one-half cup of that,” she said. “They need to be able to translate that into food choices and learn how to do it.”

Webb often starts with knife skills, a lesson on how to select cookware and an overview of basic cooking techniques, such as roasting, sauteing and stir-frying.  Many home cooks are told to limit sodium, sugar and fat, she said, yet they don’t know how to do that in their own kitchens and still prepare food that tastes good – while being quick, easy and affordable.

Almost everyone is aware of what they should be doing to eat well, said Mollie Katzen, author of the new “Get Cooking: 150 Simple Recipes to Get You Started in the Kitchen.” Now they need to learn the “how” part of the equation.

One approach may be to bring back a defunct high school requirement: home economics.  That’s the solution proposed by two health professionals in the May 12 edition of the Journal of the American Medical Association.

“Many parents never learned to cook and instead rely on restaurants, takeout food, frozen meals and packaged food as basic fare. Many children seldom experience what a true home-cooked meal tastes like, much less see what goes into preparing it,” according to the commentary titled “Bring Back Home Economics Education,” written by Alice H. Lichtenstein and David S. Ludwig.

“A renovated home economics curriculum could equip young adults with the skills essential to lead long, healthy lives and reverse the trends of obesity and diet-related disease.”

They believe a mandatory food preparation curriculum in school will also help young people develop a healthy relationship with food and be less tempted to follow fad diets. They conclude that it may be among the best investments society could make.

{ 25 comments }

logo_letsmoveWith the goal of reducing 1 trillion calories in food sold annually by 2012, First Lady Michelle Obama made a major announcement today related to her Let’s Move! Childhood obesity campaign.

In a press conference today, Mrs. Obama revealed that the Partnership for a Healthier America has signed an agreement with the Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation , which is a  partnership between 16 corporations that account for roughly 20-25% of the American food supply.

The companies pledge to cut 1 trillion calories from the food they sell by 2012, along with reducing fat, sodium, sugar and calories.   Take a look at the First Lady’s remarks below:

It’s been three months since we launched “Let’s Move,” a new initiative with an ambitious goal to help reverse the epidemic of childhood obesity in this country and end it in a generation.

And we built this initiative around four main pillars.  We’re moving to make our schools healthier.  We’re moving to increase the amount of physical activity that our kids get at school and at home.  We’re moving to eliminate food deserts so that every American can have easy and affordable access to fresh, healthy foods right where they live.  And we’re moving to give parents the information they need to make healthy decisions for their families.  Most often, these decisions involve the food that we – that our families buy.

Now, we all know how important it is to eat less sugar and fat and more fruits and vegetables and whole grains.  But we also know that sometimes it’s just easier to grab something quick and easy at the market. [click to continue…]

{ 7 comments }

Let’s Move America!

by Janet on February 9, 2010

logo_letsmoveToday was a momentous day.

President Obama signed an executive order creating a first-ever task force on childhood obesity and the First Lady Michelle Obama unveiled a new nationwide campaign to combat childhood obesity called Let’s Move.  You can learn more by visiting the Let’s Move web site and watching this video of Mrs. Obama discussing her signature project.

I wish I could have been in the audience today, but I did catch Mrs. Obama’s interview this morning with Robin Roberts on Good Morning America. She made it clear that with Let’s Move, she’s not trying to tell America what to eat, and she has no intention of becoming “the food police.”  In this video below of her announcement, she wisely says there’s a place for cookies, ice cream, burgers and fries.  It’s about balance and small changes — like replacing soda with water or skim milk.

The goal of Let’s Move is to bring together families, schools, private industry and government to make healthy living easier.  It’s about helping parents make healthy family choices.  Mrs. Obama outlined four broad ways the Let’s Move initiative will achieve its bold goal of eliminating the childhood obesity epidemic within a generation.

  • Healthier choices. Provide support to parents by offering tools and information they need to make healthier food choices for their families. The Let’s Move Web site contains a wealth of information about healthy eating, shopping and cooking — along with useful links.
  • Healthier schools. Encourage healthier food in schools through the reauthorizing the Child Nutrition Act, which supports the National School Lunch Program, and other strategies to help create healthier school environments.
  • Physical activity.  Increase physical activity among our nation’s youth (60 minutes of active and vigorous play every day), which includes modernizing and increasing participation in the President’s Physical Fitness Challenge.
  • Accessible & affordable healthy food. Make  healthy food accessible and affordable in every part of the country by eliminating “food deserts” in rural and urban areas. Check out the amazing new Food Environment Atlas that gives a state-by-state look at the location of food deserts and other indicators of how communities are accessing healthy food.

Here’s what others had to say today about Let’s Move:

Obama Foodorama
Rudd Sound Bites
New York Times
New York Times The Caucus

Here’s how you can connect with Let’s Move:

Facebook
YouTube
Let’s Move Blog

I think it’s important to show support for an effort like this.  It’s easy to be critical or cynical, but it’s going to take us all working together to make a difference.  As Mrs. Obama said, “it won’t be easy, and it won’t be quick, but we know the answers….We can decide to solve this problem.”

I agree. So let’s move!

{ 6 comments }

THE APPRENTICEIf you’re a regular visitor, then you know how I feel about The Trump Network’s dietary supplements.  Not a fan. 

Well now the multilevel marketing company is getting into children’s nutrition.  The new business is called Snazzle Snaxxs. 

Snacks and drinks that will help your kids, not hurt them.” 

You can view the entire sales pitch on SlideShare.  Or click here for a copy of the sales brochure.   These new snacks include BBQ seasoned and Sour Cream and Onion Snazzle Twissters, chocolate bars called Snazzle Barzzs, Cinnamon Apple Protein Puffs (a non-whole grain cereal called Snazzle Puffs), and a variety of fortified beverages, including a grape drink and chocolate vitamin drink (called Snazzle Stixxs and Snazzle Paxxs).  Looks like kids are supposed to eat up to 7 of these snacks a day — “replacing the bad food with the scientifically designed nutrition in great-tasting Snazzle Snaxxs.”

The Snazzle Snaxxs starter kit — one box each of the 11 different products — costs a whopping $248.  You do get a shaker to mix up the drinks and a copy of Dr. David Ludwig’s book “Ending the Food Fight.”   The book is the best thing in the kit.

You would think by the way the brochure is worded that Dr. Ludwig — an esteemed expert in childhood obesity at Children’s Hospital Boston– has granted his blessing on the products.  That couldn’t be further from the truth.

I contacted Dr. Ludwig by email and he confirmed that he is NOT endorsing these products.  He is NOT working with The Trump Network and is NOT not receiving any compensation from the company.  In fact, these are exactly the types of products that Dr. Ludwig is trying to get kids to avoid.

“Nutritionally speaking, our kids have gotten in with the wrong crowd,”  Ludwig writes in Ending the Food Fight.  ”Instead of eating foods that nourish them and help them maintain a healthy weight, they have befriended fake food.”

Well, I don’t know anything more fake than these Snazzle Snaxxs.  Yes, they may attempt to add in nutrients, along with some odd enhancements — such as dried broccoli and onion in the grape drink.  But these products are far from real food.  They even try to get their candy bar to look good.  They compare the nutrition information to a candy bar nearly twice the size (of course your bar looks like it has fewer calories and sugar — it’s SMALLER).  And here’s a look at the hefty ingredient list:

Protein blend (whey protein isolate, soy protein isolate, hydrolyzed gelatin, casein, calcium caseinate, whey protein concentrate, milk protein concentrate), sugar, fractionated palm and palm kernel oil, organic cane sugar, maltitol syrup, cocoa powder, glycerin, unsweetened chocolate, water, natural flavors, sunflower oil, enriched flour, mono- and diglycerides, modified milk ingredients, milk mineral concentrate, soy lecithin, fructooligosaccharide, vanilla extract, maltitol, pectin, salt, sodium bicarbonate, sodium phosphate, sodium citrate, carrageenan, sunflower lecithin.  

The Trump Network is gearing up for a major blitz to entice parents into buying these foods for their kids.  You can read more by visiting the blog created by the clinical director of The Trump Network, a naturopathic physician named David Maccallan.

I am not writing this article because I’m vehemently opposed to multilevel marketing (as I’ve been accused by some of the Trump distributors).  It’s the products themselves.  I don’t care how these snacks are being sold, I just don’t want parents to think that they’ve found the answer to improving the diets of their children. 

These are expensive products, fake products and not what we need.  Let’s help parents make smart, affordable choices for their kids — with an emphasis on whole foods, naturally nutrient-rich foods.  Let’s hope parents will get their nutrition advice from qualified health professionals, including registered dietitians, instead of distributors who are financially motivated to move up in the pyramid.

{ 12 comments }

Paula Deen Serves Up Food Advice for Kids

by Janet on September 30, 2009

paula deenThe queen of Southern cuisine has a new cookbook for kids:   Paula Deen’s Cookbook for the Lunch-Box Set. I must admit, Paula is not my favorite Food Network star. No doubt she’s charming and entertaining, but I don’t really embrace her deep-fried, fat-laden style of cooking.  So the thought of her cuisine translated to kids made me a bit nervous.  It seems as though Barbara Walters had a similar concern when Paula made a recent appearance on The View to promote her new book.

Paula dishes up an enormous spread of fried chicken, macaroni and cheese, strawberry cake, chocolate fondue, cookies, muffins and other Southern comforts, licking off her fingers as she described these so-called kid-friendly foods in her cookbook. The View ladies are digging right in and then Barbara asks a rather serious question:

“This is a cookbook for kids. Obesity is the number one problem for kids today. Everything you have here is enormously fattening. You tell kids to have cheesecake for breakfast . . .you tell them to have chocolate cake, meatloaf and french fries for lunch.  Does it bother you that you’re adding to it? No? Not at all?”

Paula mumbles something about moderation — “you know, we don’t eat this every day” — to an unconvinced Walters. The awkward exchange has fueled a heated debate in the blogosphere, with people passionately taking both sides — criticizing Walters for her “attack” and Paula for promoting high-calorie, fatty recipes for kids.

Yes, Walters comes down hard on Paula during this light-hearted segment (ironically, the abrupt question came soon after Paula told Walters how she reminded her of her mom and Aunt Peggy because she was so lady-like).  Ha!  Guess she didn’t know what hit her.

But how could Walters not ask this question?  How could the issue be ignored?  The entire segment was over-the-top indulgent — it seemed like a logical topic to bring up.   So can you really blame Walters…or was it just the way she said it?   What’s disturbing to me is that so many people will be looking to Paula for advice on what’s good for kids to pack in a lunch or eat for breakfast before school.  She even tried to talk about nutrition mentioning the “protein” they need.  Yes, Paula is a celebrity chef and she has a devoted following, but that doesn’t automatically make her an expert on children’s nutrition. Well, at least she’s not talking about hiding broccoli in brownies.

No, Paula is not the reason we have a childhood obesity problem in this country.  But is this the type of cookbook parents really need right now?   Was Paula ambushed by Walters on The View?  Was it a fair question?  Or should we just all calm down and shut-up?  Watch the video and let me know your thoughts.

Related Posts with Thumbnails

{ 9 comments }