From the monthly archives:

November 2012

Sensa Diet is Still Senseless to Me

by Janet on November 27, 2012

2899383920_1d5e8bf32e_bI’m glad to see that the courts agree with me.  Sensa Products, LLC and its parent corporation Intelligent Beauty Inc. has agreed to pay more than $900,000 to settle a false advertising lawsuit.  This lawsuit was filed in Santa Cruz County by nine California district attorneys for the Counties of Santa Cruz, Alameda, Marin, Monterey, Napa, Orange, Santa Clara, Solano and Sonoma.

Alameda County District Attorney Nancy O’Malley said the lawsuit was necessary because the federal government does not regulate the dietary supplement market.

“Unlike prescription medication, dietary supplements do not need to be pre-approved by the FDA before they can be sold to consumers. A dietary supplement can be sold in the United States without prior government approval or proof that it is either safe or effective for its intended use.”

Sensa  became the subject of a Statewide Nutritional Supplement Task Force investigation after it made claims that its weight loss effects had been clinically proven in the “largest clinical study” ever conducted, according to the Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office.  An independent expert concluded that the study did not meet scientific or competency standards. As part of the settlement, Sensa and Intelligent Beauty are permanently prohibited from making claims about the effectiveness of their product without first having verifiable, reliable scientific evidence. 

The companies are also forbidden from continuing to charge customers for shipments they sent customers who had requested that their orders be cancelled and from enrolling customers in an automatic shipping program without letting customers know about their obligations to the program.

I’ve been warning against this “sprinkle diet” for quite awhile:

Sensa Diet Smells Fishy to Me

Sensa Diet (Still) Smells Fishy to Me

I certainly hope we’ll see fewer commercials for Sensa, especially like this one with the dancing women in white bikinis.

Maybe we’ll finally see people come to their senses about Sensa.  Will this help?  I’m not sure.

Dr. Oz recently addressed  the Sensa debate on his show: Sensa- Sensation or Senseless? And I was glad to see him give Louis Aronne, MD and registered dietitian Kristin Kirkpatrick an opportunity to challenge some of the claims.  But I’m afraid it also gave Dr. Alan Hirsch a national platform to make his pitch. Did the voice of reason win out or was Dr. Hirsch more convincing? What do you think?

image courtesy of Bartzib on flickr

{ 4 comments }

Ditch the “Diet” Food

by Janet on November 15, 2012

skinny fiberI’m not a big fan of “diet” foods.  And I hate products touted as “skinny” or “guilt-free,” something I’ve written about before.

My latest blog post for WedMD’s Real Life Nutrition  explores why fat-free, sugar-free and other so-called diet foods are not always the best choice.    Hope you’ll check it out.

In my post, I highlighted a fascinating study that may make you think twice about always defaulting to the low-fat snack or sugar-free dessert.   To me, it really reinforced why we should be approaching food with a sense of pleasure – not guilt, fear, or regret. If you’re in a constant search for the best “diet” food, you may never feel fully satisfied and may simply keep eating to fill up the void.  And that’s what this Yale study demonstrated.  

Alia Crum and colleagues gave participants two different types of milkshakes – one was a “diet” version, described as fat-free, no added sugar, and low-calorie. Its label promised “guilt-free satisfaction.” The other shake was the indulgent version, described as high-fat with 620 calories. Its label touted “decadence you deserve.” Guess what? They were the exact same milkshake (380 calories), but the participants didn’t know that.

When the participants drank the “guilt-free” milkshake, their bodies responded much differently than when they consumed the indulgent shake. Even though the nutrient profiles of the shakes were identical, the diet shake was less satisfying and the researchers had blood samples to prove it. They measured levels of ghrelin, or what’s often referred to as the “hunger hormone.” When your blood levels of ghrelin are high, it sends signals to your brain to say you’re hungry. As you eat, ghrelin levels fall, which reduces your appetite and makes you feel full.  Ghrelin levels may also influence your metabolism: low levels speed up your calorie burn, while high levels may slow the burning of calories.

After drinking the indulgent milkshake, the ghrelin levels of the participants dramatically declined. Yet, when they were given the diet milkshake, ghrelin levels stayed stable – indicating that their bodies did not get the same signals of fullness.  That’s rather astounding to me. Participants drank a shake that had the same amount of calories and fat, but their perceptions of what they were about to drink altered their body’s physiological response. When we think we’re getting a “diet” food, we anticipate feeling deprived and our body reacts with more hunger and less satiety.

To me, this is even more evidence to ditch the diet food, and keep pleasure a part of the picture at mealtime. You may find yourself eating less and enjoying it more.

 

image courtesy of goldrushdirect on flickr

Related Posts with Thumbnails

{ 7 comments }