From the monthly archives:

October 2009

Sifting Through New Sugar Guidelines

by Janet on October 25, 2009

source: Flickr Howzey

source: Flickr Howzey

The American Heart Association’s new guidelines for added sugars was the topic of my latest article in the Chicago Tribune.  It’s been interesting to see the reaction to these new recommendations — which are the strictest of any major health organizations’ guidelines.  The AHA says most women should eat no more than 100 calories of added sugars or 6 teaspoons (25 grams), which is less than what you’d find in a can of soda.  Men are advised to keep added sugars to just 150 calories or 9 teaspoons (37 grams). The guidelines have stirred up a bit of debate, and I interviewed someone on both sides.

“These guidelines are a huge leap for many Americans, but I think it’s appropriate to set the bar high as we move toward this goal,” said Dr. David Ludwig, a nutrition researcher and pediatric obesity expert at Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School in Boston.  Ludwig has been a vocal advocate of the controversial “soda tax” to help reduce our country’s reliance on sugar-sweetened beverages.” Sugar sweetened beverages (including soft drinks, sweet teas and energy drinks) are the major source of added sugars in the American diet.  A 12-ounce can of soda contains about 130 calories and 8 teaspoons of sugar.

I also talked with Jeff Stier, associate director of the American Council on Science and Health.

“There is nothing about sugar per se that’s harmful; it’s the over-consumption of sugar,” he told me.  ”But it’s not just sugar, it’s the over-consumption of any source of calories.”  Stier said it’s the same as eating too many bagels.  Sugars and carbohydrates contain the same number of calories per gram as protein.  Fats contain more than twice as many.  ”Our bodies can’t tell the difference between natural and added sugars because nutritionally they’re the same.  Added sugar causes obesity as much as the orange juice promoted by the American Heart Association causes obesity.

Stier believes than singling out sugar just distracts us from the larger goal of getting overall calorie intake in control.  ”It comes down to calories consumed and calories burned,” he said.

So what’s the bottom line?

Sugar has always been criticized for being an “empty calorie.”  It adds calories without contributing any positive nutrients to our diet.  But beyond the calories (and of course the cavity connection), there’s a debate about how much we can blame sugar itself for obesity and diabetes.  Now the AHA raises concerns about the impact sugar has on our heart.

What we do know is that the form of the added sugars in our diet seems to make a difference.  Studies have shown that added sugars in soft drinks are more likely to have a negative impact on weight and diet quality, yet sugars added to flavored milk and breakfast cereals seem to have a positive influence.  So it makes sense to choose your sugar by the company it keeps.

The lead author of the AHA guidelines Rachel Johnson,PhD, RD, a professor of nutrition at the University of Vermont, recommends that people use their added sugars “allotment” to enhance the flavor of nutrient-rich foods, such as milk, yogurt and whole-grain cereal, instead of eating candy and other sweets that offer little in return.

Cutting down on soft drinks seems like a prudent place to start.  These sweet drinks contribute 33% of the added sugars to the American diet — more than any other single source.  And it’s not just the calories, sweetened beverages are likely taking the place of a more nutritious choice.  So it’s what you’re missing that’s a problem too.

It’s really all about balance, said registered dietitian Bonnie Taub-Dix, a New York-based spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association, who I interviewed for my Chicago Tribune article.

“You can’t point a finger at one food or one nutrient.  It’s a combination of so many things that contribute to our country’s health issues,” she said.  ”Still, cutting down on sugar is a positive start.”

Click here to read the full article, including a sidebar that  identifies the major sources of added sugars in the American diet and explains various sugar definitions.

Now with sugar in the hot seat, the last thing I want people to do is turn to so-called natural sugars because they think they’re a better option.  All too often people are mislead and load up on “natural” alternatives, when in reality the ingredients are exactly the same as the ones they’re trying to avoid.  That’s the case with evaporated cane juice and agave nectar.   In fact, the government is looking into the potential confusion of the term “evaporated cane juice.”  It may sound better, but it’s sugar (from sugar cane).  It has nothing to do with juice.  Also, agave nectar has been the new darling in the natural foods industry, but this processed sugar from the agave cactus is now being investigated for potential health concerns. Don’t think you can indulge just because the food or beverage you buy boasts about “no refined sugar” when it contains evaporated cane juice or agave nectar.

Sugar is sugar, even with a more enticing name.  All forms can be enjoyed — in moderation.

{ 2 comments }

bottom-bannerEveryone is always searching for the next big thing. And that’s especially true in the nutrition world. Nowadays, it seems the biggest guessing game is all about identifying what will be the next new superfruit.  What will capture America’s imagination in the same way as pomegranate, acai and gogi berry.

I’m torn about this whole superfruit thing.  There are great fruits in our own backyard, do we really need to scour the Amazon Rainforest and other exotic locales to find our fruit.  Often these tropical superfuits are only flavorings or sold in juice form only,  so it’s not really a better choice than picking up a whole peach, biting into an apple or eating a bowl of American-grown berries or cherries.

If you can actually find some of these new exotic superfruits and bite into them the same way the indigenous groups do in the Amazon, Peru, Asia or elsewhere, then that’s great.  But rarely is the actually fruit even available here to buy in the U.S.  Instead, we’re left with only a splash in a juice that’s blended with apple juice, white grape juice and other juices.  Or a small amount of pulp is added to yogurt, smoothies, granola bars and other packaged food to create an aura of health.

And I’m tired of this ORAC battle:  ”my ORAC value is higher than yours….” This measure of antioxidant capacity has become one of the primary marketing claims made by the superfruits.  This is a test-tube analysis and doesn’t necessarily translate to anything that actually happens in our bodies. True, antioxidants found naturally in fruits and vegetables may have health-promoting properties. But focusing on what juice has the highest ORAC value is basically meaningless.  And higher is not necessarily better.

Many of these so-called superjuices are sold via multi-level marketing (MLM) and are extremely expensive ($40-$50 per bottle), but the antioxidant values have been shown to be comparable to apple juice. I’ve previously written about the Sly Allure of the Superjuices, and Skeptoid has a great article about Monavie and Other “Superfruit” Juices.

Superfruit juices may be good sources of antioxidants compared to, say, spaghetti or a cheeseburger; but if you want antioxidants, you’ll get far more of them for about 1/100th the price by simply eating common fruit from the supermarket.

Even so, there’s a whole crop of new superfruits that are getting ready for their close-up.  They’re all attempting to break through and be the next superstar superfruit:

Maqui berry — A deeply purple berry that grows in remote distant Pantagonia, claims to have the highest antioxidant values of any fruit, a starring ingredient in the latest superjuice sold by MLM distributors
Lulo fruit — A South American fruit, also known as naranjilla, looks like an orange-colored tomato with light-green jelly-like flesh that tastes like pineapple or lemon
Mamey fruit — A taste between apricot, peach and papaya
CupuacuA cousin to cacao (cocoa beans), dubbed the “pharmacy in a fruit.”  The latest fruit from the Brazilian Rainforest to be featured in a superjuice called Fruta Vida that’s sold through distributors via MLM
Baobab — A traditional plant grown in Africa, known as “dead rat tree” because of the appearance of the fruit
YumberryNew commercial nickname for the Yang Mei berry from China, also called waxberries
Kiwiberry — Derived from the Actinidia arguta fruit, also known as “hardy kiwi fruit”

Yacon root –
Sweet-tasting tubers with a taste like a fresh apple and watermelon combined, contains the fiber inulin
Fejoia –
Popular in New Zealand and Australia, also known as pineapple guava or guavasteen
Gac — A Southeast Asian fruit with a traditional history of use of its eye health benefits, rich in lycopene and beta carotene
Indian gooseberry or Amia — A popular fruit used extensively in Ayurvedic herbal preparations, high in tannins
Guarana – A fruit from a shrub native to Brazil and Venezuala, a natural stimulant similar to caffeine
Acerola — Also known as Barbados cherry, bright red fruit well known for its vitamin C content
Aronia — A bright red fruit also known as chokeberries, high in anthocyanins
Pomelo — A Chinese citrus fruit that tastes like a sweet, mild grapefruit
UchuvaA sweet and tangy Columbia fruit, high in dietary fiber, showing up in trail mixes and nutrition bars, also known as Cape Gooseberry and Goldenberry

Uchuva

Uchuva

Other popular superfruits include mangosteen and noni, which are ingredients in several of the superjuices.  You may already be  familiar with some fruits that are superfruit contenders: blood orange, black currants and lychee.

The superfruit phenomenon is getting to be too much.  That’s why some people are attempting to define what superfruit even means, Comprehensive Criteria for Superfruit Status.  There’s even an organization that was created called the Superfruit Information Organization, although I found this site a bit curious. Even though it says the organization was created by “concerned citizens” who want to “band together and let the facts be known!” it seems like they’re just selling superfruit products.

I just wish people would think all fruits are super.

{ 8 comments }

simply-pb-packageIngredient lists on food labels are shrinking.  Have you noticed?  Now it’s hip to have the fewest as possible.

That’s the topic of my latest article A guide to food labels in the Chicago Tribune.

When it comes to packaged food, a short ingredient list has become something to brag about.

Food author and activist Michael Pollan has been a major champion of this concept. In his frequently cited “rules of eating,” Pollan suggests avoiding products with more than five ingredients, or ingredients you can’t pronounce.

If you can’t say it, don’t eat it, he advises. Or if your great-grandmother wouldn’t recognize it, skip it.
Food manufacturers appear to be taking notice. Today, it’s all about few and familiar ingredients.

Natural, pure and clean are the new demands.  It’s part of the simplicity trend I’ve previously written about.

First, it was Five, the new line of Haagen-Dazs ice cream that’s made with only five ingredients — including well-known kitchen staples (milk, ice cream, sugar and eggs).  Then, Pillsbury introduced Simply cookies that are based on a similar premise.  ”Made just like you would make at home, same ingredients, same process.

Many food companies are scrambling to simplify ingredient lists and find naturally sourced alternatives to create what has been dubbed a “clean label.”  And when they do, they proudly declare “no artificial flavors, colors or preservatives” on the front of the package.  That has become one of the most popular claims made by new foods and beverages, according to the market research firm Mintel.

In this era of fresh, organic and whole foods, we’ve become a national fearful of food additives,” said dietitian Elisa Zied, a New York-based spokeswoman for the American Dietetic Association.

“People want to know what they’re eating,” she said.

Zied does suggest looking for foods with the fewest ingredients possible, but she said it’s just a rule of thumb — and one that can be broken.  ”If you don’t have food allergies, choose yourfive battles,” she said.

I also interviewed food scientist Barry Swanson, a professor of food science at Washington State University and a spokesman for the Institute of Food Technologists.  He told me there was a lot of confusion over ingredients…

“Consumers think any ingredient with two syllables is dangerous.  Yet many of the long words are added nutrients (such as ascorbic acid or vitamin C) and natural compounds, including extracts from fruit or other food sources that act as antioxidants to preserve freshness. All ingredients are added for a reason, and they wouldn’t be there if they weren’t safe,” he said.

Even so, many people are concerned about food additives.  That’s why I put together a guide to help translate the terms you might see on a food label and learn why these ingredients are added to foods.  Check out the article to learn more.  Or check out two other excellent resources:

{ 8 comments }

Emerald Cocoa Roast Almonds are Divine

by Janet on October 9, 2009

51DSDeTdekL._SL500_AA280_I stumbled upon these new Cocoa Roast Almonds when browsing the snack aisles at Target last weekend.  I like to keep a stash of nuts in my office for afternoon noshing. And I must admit, I often look for the pre-portioned packages because I can’t seem to stop with just one handful.

So I was intrigued when I saw 100-calorie packs of dark chocolate almonds.

I bought a box and took them to work with me. Yesterday afternoon I tore into a package to try them and they were amazing! The chocolate is just a light dusting of cocoa powder that’s baked into the roasted almonds.  It’s not too sweet and doesn’t overwhelm the almond.  It’s not at all like the chocolate-dipped almonds that are indulgently good.  But that takes almonds into an entirely different category of candy — with a lot more calories and sugar.

These almonds are very different than the candy-type almonds.  The cocoa powder offers the perfect hint of dark chocolate, but lets the taste of the almonds come through (and without the added calories and sugar).  The package labeling promotes the fact that the chocolate is baked in so there’s no mess on your hands.  True, but they did flake a bit.

Almonds are a fantastic nut — one of the highest in vitamin E (20% of the Daily Value per serving).  The 100-calorie package contains 8 grams of fat (but that’s the good kind!) and 4 grams of carbohydrates (including 2 grams of dietary fiber). They do contain some artificial flavors and sucralose appears in the ingredient list, but that doesn’t bother me.  There’s a tremendous amount of research on almonds, so it’s definitely a nut to eat more often.

The nuts were so good, I had two packages.  Oops.  So much for the 100-calorie portions.

But these cocoa-dusted nuts are a much better choice than many of the 200-calorie “nutrition” bars that are simply vitamin-infused candy bars.  They’re a great option for keeping in your bag for an on-the-go snack. The protein content of the nuts helps tame your appetite, and the chocolate flavor helps satisfy a craving for something sweet.

And by the way…I was not given these products by the company (Diamond Foods, Inc.).  I bought them myself at Target, and had never even heard of these nuts before my shopping trip. If I am ever given free product to review, dear reader, I will most definitely reveal that fact to you.  This has always been my personal policy, and now it’s a policy of the Federal Trade Commission.

Perhaps you’ve heard by now, FTC has released new guidelines for bloggers.  The guidelines are intended to enforce  ethical blogging.  FTC can fine bloggers up to $11,000 for not disclosing payments to recommend products.  Even receiving free products to review must be disclosed.  I will certainly do that, and will never strike a pay-per-post deal.

Let me know if you’ve tried the new Cocoa Roast Almonds or if you’ve found a new snack that you’d recommend.

{ 9 comments }

Sensible Advice About Vitamin Supplements

by Janet on October 2, 2009

FDADevelop a vitamin strategy.  That’s the advice from the Food and Drug Adminstration. The main message in the agency’s new consumer education initiative is to focus on FOOD for your primary nutrient needs, then supplement wisely.

Dietary supplements may be beneficial for some people, but they are not substitutes for a healthful diet. You can learn more by visiting the FDA web site, which includes a downloadable copy of Fortify Your Knowledge About Vitamins.

The handout outlines the groups who are most likely to benefit from vitamin supplements:  people with certain health problems, vegetarians/vegans and pregnant/breastfeeding women.  The nutrients of concern include calcium, potassium, magnesium, fiber, and vitamins A, C and E.

Before you stock up on various supplements, consider these tips from FDA:

  • Don’t chase headlines. Sound health advice is generally based on research over time, not a single study touted by the media.  Be wary of results claiming a “quick fix” that departs from scientific research and established dietary guidance.
  • More is not better. Some products can be harmful when consumed in high amounts, for a long time, or in combination with certain other substances.
  • Learn to spot false claims. If something sounds too good to be true, it probably is.  Watch out for quick and effective “cure all,” can treat or cure disease, “totally safe,” “all natural,” and has “definitely no side effects.”  Other red flags include claims about limited availability, offers of “no risk, money-back guarantee,” and requirements for advance payment.

Today’s dietary supplements are not only vitamins and minerals, they also include other less familiar substances such as herbals, botanicals, amino acids and enzymes, said Vasilios Frankos, director of FDA’s Division of Dietary Supplement Programs.  “Check with your health care providers before combining or substituting them with other foods or medicines.  Do not self-diagnose any health condition.  Work with your health care providers to determine how best to achieve optimal health.”

So true.  Here’s a video that recaps FDA’s campaign to Fortify Your Knowledge about Vitamins:

Related Posts with Thumbnails

{ 2 comments }