From the monthly archives:

July 2009

Recessionary Food Trends

by Janet on July 27, 2009

piggybankingrocerycartThe recession is making its impact throughout the grocery industry, according to the Food Marketing Institute’s U.S. Grocery Shopper Trends 2009 report.  Consumers are changing what they buy, how they shop and even where they shop.  The new FMI report outlines three major shopping trends related to the economy: 

  • Saving money on eating out:  55% of shoppers now spend less money on dining out than they did one year ago.  People are eating out less (69%) or eating out in less expensive places (50%).   Consumers also believe they’re doing something good for their family when they eat at home; 92% believe that home-cooked meals are much healthier than the food they eat when dining out. 
  • Money-saving measures at current store:  Shoppers are trading down, substituting and eliminating in efforts to save money on groceries.  The most frequently cited change was the switch to private label (66%).  Shoppers also said they were more likely to compare unit prices, clip coupons, seek sales specials, make grocery lists, and resist impulse purchases or luxury items.
  • Switch primary grocery store:  Shoppers tend to have a great loyalty to their primary store and only 6% said they switched primary stores to save money.  However, 45% said they occasionally shop at other stores to capitalize on sales specials.

Price has become shoppers’ primary means of comparison.  While appearance, nutrition and brand are key features, 76% always check the price when purchasing an item for the first time.  Beyond the first-time purchase, price is now the number one factor in selecting their primary store.  The report concludes than many of these changes appear to be quite durable and not likely to be abandoned quickly after the economy improves.

One recessionary trend that Elizabeth Sloan identifies in Food Technology is the “pleasure principle.”  As people cut back on dining out, she writes, they’ll be looking for additional excitement in the foods they eat at home.  She says that despite a tough economy, consumers have demonstrated their willingness to splurge on indulgent treats, beverages that ensure enjoyable “me time,” and snack foods that provide a unique, emotional, flavorful and fun experience.

Ice cream and chocolate are tied as the top treats that people (55%) are willing to pay a premium; these categories are followed by cookies (37%), frozen cheddarbeernovelties (31%) and coffee (28%).  Snacking frequency has rebounded and indulgent snacking has gained momentum, with 47% of consumers snacking on what tastes good rather than what’s healthy.  The snacking trend includes foods that bring the restaurant experience home, “minis” (snack-sized versions of favorite indulgent treats), and extreme/unique flavors, such as Kettle Brand Chips that range from Cheddar Beer to Island Jerk.

Other recession-related “pleasure principle” food trends:

  • Comfort foods redefined:  Feel-good foods will be dressed up with more authentic regional recipes, preparations and flavors.  In 2009, chili topped the list of comfort foods appearing on restaurant menus, followed by fried chicken, ribs, grilled cheese, macaroni and cheese, catfish, waffles, meatloaf, chicken fried steak and pot roast.  Terms like New York-style, Southwestern, Southern-style, Cajun-style, Boston-style and Santa Fe-style were the most frequently used American descriptors on menus.
  • Traditional, ancient and heritage:  Food marketers and restaurateurs are touting traditional recipes and back story-laden “ancient” or “heritage” ingredients, such as ancient grains (quinoa or spelt).
  • Basic scratch ingredients with upscale twist:  Flavored butters, exotic salts, unique forms of rice, preserves infused with wine or herbs, and unique oils, such as pine-flavored Smoked Olive Oil are appealing to cooking enthusiasts. 
  • Party fare:  With nearly half (47%) of consumers having people over at least once a month, it’s not surprising that there’s an explosive demand for foods tysonand beverages that help make entertaining at home easier, fancier and more fun.  New products include party-sized portions for potlucks, church gatherings and book clubs. Micro-distilled/artisan liquor tops the list of alcohol and cocktail trends for 2009.
  • International flair:  With a 78% downturn in foreign vacations anticipated for 2009, U.S. consumers will be relying on more “armchair” culinary travel.  Mexican food, regional Italian, Spanish, Japanese, Greek, Thai, Indian, Vietnamese and Moroccan top the list of restaurant foods consumers would like to prepare at home.
  • Flavor-driven products:  Among IRI Pacesetters, 83% carried a new or unique variety claim, 69% boasted a new or unique recipe, 51% a new flavor combination and 27% an improved taste claim.  Popular exotic fruit flavors include lychee, dragonfruit and black currant. 

{ 5 comments }

THE APPRENTICEDoes Donald Trump now think he’s a nutrition expert?  Looks like The Donald’s next business venture is all about selling nutritional supplements and weight loss products.  And he’s doing it through multilevel marketing (MLM), otherwise known as a pyramid scheme. 

The new company is called  The Trump Network and it’s officially being launched in November. I only wish that I could say “you’re fired” before it gets started.  As you can see from the web site, the mission of The Trump Network is to encourage its independent marketers to achieve personal and financial independence.  He’s recruiting and “educating” distributors now to sell the so-called unique, cutting edge  products that are described as  “highly advanced, scientifically-proven health and wellness products, including customized testing and metabolic analysis, effective weight management solutions and vitamin and mineral supplements.”

Oh my.  Why doesn’t he just stick to real estate.

The power of Trump’s name will likely make this nutritional Ponzi scheme  a success — meaning that millions of people will be spending a lot of money on products  they don’t need.  They’ll likely trust his nutrition advice, and the advice of the “trained” distributors, even if much of the information is not scientifically solid.

I wish The Donald would have done more of his homework on this.  He’s joining forces with a multilevel marketing company called Ideal Health that’s been around for 10+ years (and has had its share of FTC complaints).  The “custom-made” nutritional supplements rely on what’s called a PrivaTest, which is an at-home urine test that claims to tell you what supplements your body needs every day.  Hog wash.

trump-privatestA urine analysis is not a reliable measure of nutritional status and it certainly doesn’t do all the things that are described on Ideal Health’s web site. This misleading tactic for selling a customized nutritional supplement regimen was previously exposed by Quackwatch in 2004.   Check out Quackwatch’s review of Ideal Health’s PrivaTest and Custom Essentials supplements. 

On the Trump Network site it says  “metabolic testing and customized supplements are no longer luxuries for the wealthy.”  Oh, great.  Now hard-working families can waste their money too.   It says “thousands of The Trump Network’s consumers are convinced their Custom Essentials are boosting their cellular nutrition and giving them nutritional balance and optimal metabolic health.   Join us.”

Go to your doctor for a physical exam. Schedule a consultation with a registered dietitian.  That’s the best way to tell if your diet is inadequate in certain nutrients.  Don’t take the advice of Donald  Trump or a Trump salesperson who profits on the purported profile of your pee.

trump-silhouettesolution3And if your diet does fall short in nutrients, you certainly don’t need to buy these so-called customized formulas (Donald Trump Vitamins) that can be purchased for a lot less in any supermarket or drug store.  If you want to lose weight, stick to real food and not the disgusting sounding shakes, bars and snacks that are part of the Silhouette Solution Program.  This fake-food fad diet will cost you $1,325.00 to get started.  It’s not only expensive, but an approach I certainly can’t support.  You eat only one “light” meal a day and then munch on five of these packaged snacks throughout the day — and supposedly “fat will melt off your body.”  Instead of an abundance of fresh fruits, vegetables and whole grains — you eat BBQ Puffs, Vanilla Creme Shakes and Chocolate Delight Bars.  

This new venture may make business sense for Donald Trump, but it certainly doesn’t make any nutritional sense.

{ 102 comments }

vector eco shopping bag“Natural” keeps gaining steam, even if people aren’t quite sure what it means.

A new survey found Amercian shoppers believe a “natural” label claim is a better indicator of an eco-friendly product than “organic.”    The Shelton Group conducted a survey of 1,006 U.S. consumers and found that nearly two-thirds were looking for greener products.  Yet many consumers have become more skeptical of companies’ green credentials, accusing them of “greenwashing.”  They also don’t seem to understand green terminology.

When asked “How do you know a product is green?” the top response was “don’t know/not sure,” at 22%.  The second most popular response, at 20%, was “says so on the package/label.”   And what influenced them the most on the label?  The most persuasive was ”100% natural,” at 31%.  The term “organic” was less trusted, at 14%.

Despite federal certification standards, consumers thought ”organic” was an unregulated marketing buzzword that means the product is more expensive.  “Natural” carried more weight.

organic-food-usda-94513This comes at time when the purity of the “organic” label is being questioned.  This Washington Post article reviews the issue and the growing concern that trust in the USDA Organic label is eroding. 

“Relaxation of the federal standards, and an explosion of consumer demand, have helped push the organics market into a $23 billion-a-year business, the fastest growing segment of the food industry….But the USDA program’s shortcomings mean that consumers, who at times must pay twice as much for organic products, are not always getting what they expect:  foods without pesticides and other chemicals, produced in a way that is gentle to the environment.

The market’s expansion is fueling tension over whether the federal program should be governed by a strict interpretation of “organic” or broadened to include more products by allowing trace elements of non-organic substances.  The argument is not over whether the non-organics pose a health threat, but whether they weaken the integrity of the federal organic label.  Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has pledged to protect the label, even as he acknowledged the pressure to lower standards to let more products in.”

Is organic food worth the extra cost?  That’s the question recently posed by WebMD is this slide show.

Update:  Since my original post on the subject of “natural” vs. “organic,” the topic was featured in a front-page article  in the Chicago Tribune by Monica Eng.  It really hits home the current state of consumer confusion and how the lines between natural and organic are being blurred.

{ 2 comments }

Is America Suffering From Technophobia?

by Janet on July 5, 2009

Albert Einstein, 1951, by Arthur Sasse/AFP-Getty Images file

Albert Einstein, 1951, by Arthur Sasse/AFP-Getty Images file

It seems that scientists in this country have a PR problem.  A thought-provoking editorial in

Food Technology asserts that the public’s confidence in scientists has eroded and that may be one reason people are attracted to the advice of pseudo experts. Part of the problem the authors Henry Chin, PhD, and Rhona Applebaum, PhD, say is the public is turned off by scientific jargon and they’re more apt to listen to the more effective communicator  – regardless if the information they dispense is scientifically valid.

That’s why nutrition misinformation and quackery can spread so rapidly.  If you have a persuasive messenger, then it doesn’t matter if the message is accurate. People are convinced by the communications.

The authors make a plea to the scientific community to change their ways.  They outline three major recommendations to prevent technophobia and fear mongering from spreading:

1. Scientific organizations and scientific journals should adopt a set of guiding principles on how studies are reported in the media, with an emphasis on experimental proof.  Many scares are driven by scientific reports and press releases that are more imagination than fact, the authors wrote.  In this era of reduced government funding for research, academic organizations sometimes resort to hyperbole to promote the significance of their research.  In the same way researchers must  now report conflicts of interest in conducting research, they should also have guidelines for reporting the research.

2. Scientists should help educate journalists about the scientific process and scientists need to improve their communications skills to effectively reach the public.  The authors say a best-in-class model is the science of climate change, where there were many forums to engage scientists with journalists and others who work with the general public and policy makers.  Others scientists can learn from this success.

3. Without devaluing science, scientists must learn how to communicate with non-scientists.  It is self-delusional, the authors wrote, to blame the public’s failure to understand complex scientific information on scientific illiteracy.  They said scientists must make an emotional connection with audiences.  ”We must accept the fact that we need better connectivity with the public, beginning with better communication skills and training….If we do not, the public’s confidence in science, scientists, and the scientific process will further erode.  And there will be no one to blame but ourselves.”

I thought this was quite compelling.  No matter how solid the advice, if you’re not able to effectively communicate, you lose out to the self-proclaimed expert who knows how to tell a great story. That’s why the myriad of multilevel marketing salespeople who are selling superjuices, supplements and diet aids are making such a great living — even if there’s little to back up their claims.

 

Related Posts with Thumbnails

{ 2 comments }